|
Dr. Aidoo's Second Letter to the
FDA
Dr.
Aidoo's 3rd Letter to FDA
FDA 2nd Response To Dr. Aidoo's
Letter
Dr. Aidoo's Letter to the Senators
Senator McCain Response
Letter
Over
55 Clients' Pictorials we show are various customers'
testimonials for men and women from all races who have used The AidooAid® Hair
Follicle Re-Activation System™ and provided their individual experiences. The product is not intended to treat or prevent
disease or grow hair or otherwise affect the structure or functions of the human
body. AidooAid®
products have not been evaluated by the US Food and Drug Administration. Dr.
Aidoo has written to the US FDA and few Senators about his research and his
product. We show Dr. Aidoo's letters to the Senators and the FDA, and the
response letters Dr. Aidoo received from the FDA and Senator McCain. The FDA
explained in their letters that no company should make a claim on a product that
it grows Hair or baldness treatment or hair loss therapy without obtaining FDA approvals. FDA approval process may take
more than two years and very expensive reaching the millions of Dollars. Such an
FDA approval is only required in the USA. In compliance with the US FDA, we are not making any claim that the AidooAid® Hair
Follicle Re-activation System™ Grow Hair.
Dr. Aidoo's Second Letter to the FDA
David Kessler, M.D. April
26, 1996-2000
Commissioner: Food &
Drug Administration,
5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857-001
Dear Dr. Kessler,
Re:
AidooAid The Bald No More System.
This is my second letter to
you exactly two years to date; on the above product--the end result of my 20
years of research work.
I am a research scientist
in the field of Enzymes and Alkaloids. My work has led to the discovery of 35
virgin formats of enzymatic traits, and 12 master alkaloids pre-emptor of
invaluable accord to humankind...
In my letter of April 22,
1994, I contested the ruling you made in January 1990 concerning Rogaine. The
assertion was unequivocal in your statement. It was that--and I quote: " Rogaine
with 2% minoxidil is the only product proven to stimulate hair growth." un
quote.
The above ruling is what
led me to write you the letter referred to above; of which I am enclosing a
copy; and other scientific data collected over the years legitimizing in
total--the statement: AidooAid The Bald No More System actually grows
hair!...And that it grows hair on sufferers of alopecia, including arieta,
totalis and androgenetica. (commonly known as male and female pattern baldness).
And unlike Rogaine, it has no side effects; and it grows hair on all areas of
the head -- not the vertex area alone, but also frontal and what I call "annexal
areas and patches."
I had included the
pictorial documentation to accent the uniqueness of my work.
Your action has led to a
state within which my life’s work was deduced to "semi-fraud" in the face of
those who heard our claim that: AidooAid actually
grows hair!
In spite of the fact that I
sent you all this information, your department was aware of this breakthrough
sometime back in June 1992, in which an article was written about my work in the
Sun Telegraph newspaper of San Bernardino, California; and an interview with The
Los Angeles Times.
Before publication, your
office was contacted and a statement relayed to the above newspaper by your west
coast bureau spokesperson: Mike Shaffer, conceded to our validity, and yet,
there was no attempt on your part to redress or rescind your statement.
Rogaine has been proven not
to grow hair as ascribed by your office... It is ineffective, and by that
dimension, has destroyed the public’s view and perception toward legitimate
claims such as ours. It cannot grow--and this is for refutation purposes: one
hundredth of hair AidooAid is capable of...
AidooAid does not stimulate hair growth as asserted
by Rogaine’s outlay... It actually re-activates the dormant hair follicles to
grow hair again!...And it does not take 4 months or longer like Rogaine: ...The
fact that it works with the follicles, the re-activation becomes evident within
two to three weeks upon use, sometimes before! And being arranged with an
organic coenzymes, the new hair does not fall "off" with reduction or cessation of
use. And therefore, unlike Rogaine, it is not a lifelong proposition...You have
all this, including all the pertinent scientific data on your record!
My work has revealed that
there is an unnatural membrane which I call: gHanape-bio. It grows to
hinder--restricting the "free flow" of sebumatic factors to the follicles. Once
the gHanape-bio is debased, the follicle(s) assume accord of viability--growing
hair again into its anagenic state.
I love America, and I want
America to benefit from my findings and discoveries. And as a scientist, there
have been times when I have thought of selling my work to other nations and
pharmaceutical companies... In essence, offer them the leadership in this arena.
I need to be accorded a
reply to this my second letter; to which copies are also sent to the names
enumerated below.
Sincerely,
Frank Aidoo. Ph.D
Enzyme & Alkaloids
Research Scientist
cc. News Editor CNN cc.
Editor: New York Times
cc. Editor: Washington
Post cc. American Academy of Dermatology
cc. Governor Pete
Wilson. cc. Mike Shaffer, West Coast office FDA
Dr.
Aidoo's 3rd Letter to FDA
Diane E. Thompson,
Associate Commissioner for Legislative Affairs,
U.S. Food & Drug Administration,
Rockville, MD 20857
Dear Ms. Thompson,
Re:
I have received your letter of October 21, 1997, in answer to one on my
behalf from Senator John McCain: the chairman of the U.S. Committee on Commerce,
Science and Transportation.
I was taken “aback” by inference that you did not receive my letter sent to
the department—addressed to the former commissioner Dr. David Kessler.
To establish the viability of my letter, I enclose herewith the “return
receipt” of delivery from the U.S. Postal Service.
In reading your response, I notice the “theme” of my letter—the contention
and the essence of it—being the statement made by the then commissioner that
Rogaine is the only product proven to grow hair was not addressed.
As I commented, the statement was emphatically, very conclusive. It appeared
to have represented the totality of scientific motion, and as such resonated
across the GLOBE—measuring with his stand as the Commissioner of Unite States
Food & Drug Administration (FDA).
Ms. Thompson, the fact of the matter is: my 12 year old son and his
classmates cannot understand why they clearly see in accord ’hair’ on PEOPLE WHO
DID NOT HAVE HAIR, (after examining pictures/data of users of AidooAid and
meeting some…) but are in essence accosted to disregard the
prevailing, and are to adopt words of a trusted keeper of United States
government—totally inconsistent—and at odd with what they clearly see with their
reasoning: It demarcates their understanding; and are left confused and
frustrated!
--Pertaining to classification of products, my research which covered more
than 20 years, also measured the categories under which “cosmetics and natural
based” products are augmented under the laws of the United States as enumerated
under the FDA guidelines. By your suggestion, I have re-visited them
thoroughly—concentrating on the define of “herbal,” as the base of my work fits
more under this category.)
AidooAid is a “scientific breakthrough” that uses a NON-DRUG base! And are
unlike “drug” based products such as Minoxidel (Rogaine by Upjohn), and
Finasteride (Merck’s Proscar), a drug awaiting your confirmation.
Science, I believe, and trust you will agree is still evolving. It does not
have answer(s) to all our ill(s) and will never. Your inversion that it is only
“drug” that has the ability to grow hair has no bases; and by the data and
support I have collected to date deems that adage to be totally false. My work
therefore, has made such theory held before the emergence of AidooAid obsolete,
since the “proof and evidence” presented cannot be refuted.
At this state, I request as a matter of scientific fact, that, a statement be
made to the effect that AidooAid has the ability to re-activate the “dormant
hair follicle” to grow hair again…and more so that Rogaine or Finasteride; and
without any of the side effects; being that it utilizes “a breakthrough”
cartelization of enzymatic order, to which the data and pictorial submitted to
date suffice…
As I stated in my letter to the Senator—in his esteem capacity, I believe
this great NATION called America epitomizes progress and truth; and I also
believe your department was requested to answer my citation. This warrants
clarification in view of the fact that AidooAid grows hair…and achieves an
unprecedented result, far capable than any product out in the market (being
those bearing activeness of Drug, OTC, Homeopathic or botanical/herbal
preparation).
As you may have seen the pictorial data presented on our
internet site, AidooAid grows hair on sufferers of male and female
pattern baldness (Androgenic Alopecia). It stops hair loss; and unlike the
others, it works well on both frontal and vertex hair loss; and being that the
base is organic in composition, when a user discontinue its use after he/she has
grown their hair back, the hair does not fall out! …This is achieved because of
the fact that it is not a drug like Minoxidel or Finasteride where cessation of
use denotes resumption of hair loss…and is meant therefore to be used
indefinitely. –They are drugs! —And as such unnaturally cajoles/stimulates
growth: usually “vellus” hair growth, while AidooAid facilitates the “dormant
hair follicle” to use its own chemistry to grow hair back naturally—resulting in
the pictorial and data posted: one that cannot be duplicated using any
DRUG-BASED PRODUCT.
I have posted documents detailing my work including over one hundred
pictorial data substantiation its efficacy. It should also be conferred that my
work is a BREAKTHROUGH IN THIS FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH and REASONING, and
for the sake of human progress should be embraced. As an empiricist, it would
be appropriate to understand that my theory and its format are markedly
antithesis to the prevailing, as it further enhances man’s ability to redress
some of the “idiopathic” complexities from a different angle: such as the one
used in achieving the results I have presented including others yet to be
revealed…
I look forward to your certain reply.
Frank Aidoo Ph.D
cc: Senator John McCain
FDA 2nd Response To Dr. Aidoo's Letter
OCT 21 1997
Dear Dr. Aidoo:
This is in response to your letter of July 27, 1997, to Senator
John McCain regarding your product AidooAid. Senator McCain requested that we
respond directly to you.
According to your letter, two previous letters you sent the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) were not answered. We want you to
know that the Agency has no record of having received these letters, and we are
sorry for the frustration you have experienced in not receiving answers.
From the information provided in your letter, we believe your
product has the potential to be considered a drug under the provisions of
sections 201(g) and 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FDC) Act
(pertinent sections enclosed) which define what is considered a drug under the
law. Also enclosed is a copy of section 310.527 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR). This section provides information on products for
hair growth or hair loss prevention
FDA regulates the manufacture, sale, and distribution of drugs
in the United States under the authority of the FDC Act, and reviews the data
included in New Drug Applications (NDAs) that are submitted for approval.
Enclosed is a copy of an FDA consumer special report entitled "From Test Tube to
Patient: New Drug Development in the United States." This report will provide a
general overview of the drug development process. After reading this report, you
may wish to refer to the FDC Act and Title 21, CFR from the Government Printing
Office (GPO). These references contain information such as regulatory
definitions and the data needed to support an approval of an NDA and marketing
regulations (there will be a charge for these manuals). Title 21, CFR is
available through our website at: www.fda.gov/cder. Select the "Regulatory
Guidance" icon, then select "Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations." You may
also wish to visit your local library and consult these references. Finally, you
can purchase copies through GPO. The GPO can be reached at the following phone
number and address:
The Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents
Attention: New Orders
P.O. Box 371954 Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15250-7954
Phone: (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250
If you decide to pursue the development of these products, you
can contact the Drug Information Branch and request an Investigational New Drug
(IND) package. The Drug Information office can provide information on any
organizations, grants, or other agencies that assist small drug businesses. If
you wish to contact them, they can be reached at the following phone number and
address:
Food and Drug Information (HFD-210) 5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, Maryland 20857
Phone: (301) 827-4573
For information on user fees, please contact the Office of
External Affairs, Industry Liaison Staff at (301) 827-3430. They can send you a
package that contains all of the current information on user fees. Please note
that small businesses can apply for a user fee exemption.
We hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely Diane E. Thompson
Associate Commissioner for Legislative Affairs
3 Enclosures Section 201 FDC Act 21 CFR section 310.527 FDA
Consumer,
"From Test Tube to Patient
Dr. Aidoo's Letter to the
Senators
July 27, 1997
Senator John McCain,
Chairman U.S. Committee on Commerce,
Science & Transportation.
Washington DC.
Dear Senator,
As per my e-mail of July 27, 1997, I hereby enclose the pertinent documents I
advised will be sent under a separate cover.
I take this moment to thank you in advance for the speedy attention offered
to my e-mails. Again, thank you.
Sir, as the attached letter (copy) sent to the then Commissioner of FDA Dr.
David Kessler will show, I am a research scientist in the field of Enzyme and
Alkaloid. My work has lead to the discovery of 35 newly formatted Enzymes; and
12 Virgin Alkaloids of unparalleled importance within the medium of science.
I have unraveled and utilized the virtues coherent within one Enzymatic
base--and supported it with an adjunct (co-enzyme) in an empirical scientific
arrangement to achieve a breakthrough in the "re-activation" of the dormant hair
follicles to GROW HAIR again! ...Being that this order of achievement is organic
in it's accentuation, it grows hair on all types of hair, and does not produce
any side effects.
...Within some of my other prevailing base(s) of Enzymes and Alkaloids--all
being proprietary with legible style of conduction, there exist discoveries
bearing composers of other biological effusers capable of suppressing and
normalizing--in some cases: "idiopathic" human abnormalities and diseases.
Over 5 years ago, a local newspaper hearing of my work sent a team to cover
it. (Sun Telegraph of San Bernardino, California). Being that the FDA had
asserted there was nothing but Rogaine--a product serendipitously discovered,
and fundamentally a Drug for the controlling of hypertension--and marked as a
topical "hair growing" product, I requested the Commissioner to rescind his
words; or investigate my claim. I have spent over 20 years in this field of
research--collecting data pictorially; and studying the different forms of
alopecia left to conjecture within the scientific community...of which I have
tonated usable terminology for their identification.
I submitted my work to AMA and over 1000 physicians in the field of
dermatology; including notable medical schools; and have been shunned due to the
statement made by the then commissioner in 1991 concerning Rogaine.
On two consecutive times, I wrote Dr. Kessler providing him with all the
necessary information for revision; with no acknowledgement or reply
resulting...
Sir, I believe that America being the world leader within the field of
science can only hold on to it's leadership when people like myself are accorded
due recognition and equity--even in science; especially, when I hold the secret
to this phenomenon...including others yet to be revealed.
My request is based on the fundamental truth--which we all seek for:
especially when a statement is antithesis to the prevailing in science. Sir, I
have provided all the pre-requisite needed for revisiting the Commissioner's
statement; and have also written to Governor Pete Wilson of California--as I
reside in his state (copy attached).
I have since then received an unceremonious visit by an individual who
announced himself as an FTC agent, who, after seeing the postings of documents
and pictures of "before and after" of some users in my office, has failed to
"officially" announce his findings.
Sir, I wish and request that your office and chair investigate what I have
brought before you. In a country where innovation and creativeness are
encouraged, I can only site a scenario of inadvertency on Dr. Kessler's part;
because, by all account--notwithstanding the scientific and pictorial submitted,
the statement made in his capacity, clearly, legitimized Rogaine with
monopolistic stripes: an official rubber stamp--in essence, in an industry
where they have not been able to show any "scientific-pictorial" proof:;
especially, when the statement was with all accord of conviction and honesty of
an FDA Commissioner.. Unfortunately, the said product (Rogaine) has since failed
to live up to it's relish: Based on what I have submitted, and by virtue of the
fact that my work has global connotation and meaning, that, I be accorded an
investigation into my citation...
I am yours sincerely,
Frank Aidoo Ph.D.
cc: Committee Members
Senators
Ted Stevens, Alaska
Conrad Burns, Montana
Slade Gortan, Washington
Trent Lott, Mississippi
Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine
John Ashcroft, Missouri
William Frist, Tennessee
Spencer Abraham, Michigan
Sam Brownback, Kansas
Ersnest F. Hollings, South Carolina
Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii
Wendell H. Ford, Kentucky
John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia
John F. Kerry, Massachusetts
John B. Breaux, Louisiana
Richard H. Bryan, Nevada
Byron L. Dorgan, North Dakota
Ron Wyden, Oregon
Enc:
Letter From Senator McCain
to Dr. Aidoo
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6125
August 18, 1997
Mr. Frank Aidoo
Aidoo International 601 S. Milliken Ave.,
Suite P Ontario, CA 91761
Dear Mr. Aidoo:
Thank you for your letter regarding Aidoo Aid and the enzyme and alkaloid
research that you have been conducting. I am always glad to have the opportunity
to be of assistance
I have contacted the Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs at the Food and
Drug Administration about the difficulty that you have encountered with Aidoo on
your behalf. I have asked for a prompt response to be sent directly to you.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
John McCain
Chairman
JM/bm
AidooAid: Hair Follicle Re-Activation System, AidooAid
MaintyDex System, AidooAid Hair Loss Combator, AidooAid The Bald No More System.
AidooAid Ancestral:are Registered Trademarks of Aidoo Enzyme and Alkaloids
Research. [Aidoo Ancestral Products Inc., Aidoo International Research &
Marketing Inc.] Copyright 1996-2002. All Rights Reserved.
The use and copying of any picture/data is subject to License
Agreement. Any other use is prohibited: No part of it may be reproduced,
transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system or translated into any
language in any form by any means without the prior written consent of Aidoo
International Research & Marketing Inc., Loma Linda, California, USA.
|
